Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
I know it’s the least important thing here, but man does he have a boring monotone voice.
The thing you two are not mentioning is how the Renlunds seem to be teaching that faith in Christ and belief in the church are not just equal to each other, that they are synonymous. They are teaching that if you doubt the church you have lost or will lose faith in God and Christ. This is such a false concept spoken in such soft and kind tone using demeaning words. Remember you stupid children that my prophet, see and revelator husband figured this out at age 11, you idiots should figure it out now. If not, you are faithless fools. Well let me tell you Sis, your husband is a late bloomer. Pres. Henry J. Eyeing figured it out as a toddler during story time in his mother’s bed. This presentation by the Renlunds can go pound sand. Mega kiddos to Bill and RFM! You two were spot on!
How many times has a Church president claimed spiritual confirmation of an assertion that is later shown to be false, or discarded by a later leader? Lots. The notion that a spiritual experience can serve as a foundation for verifying truth is absurd. In fact, the data shows the exact opposite.
BTW, sis Renlund’s claim about Steven that “Doubting pleased him more than knowing” is a cult like statement. It places the Church in very bad light