Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
Just want to let you know the link might be broken. Episode 82 won’t play or download.
Sorry about that, Jaime.
There is a glitch in the system, but I notified Bill about it yesterday morning and he took care of it.
Have I mentioned how smart Bill is . . . ?
The biggest case for the Book of Mormon is the fact that the corporation does everything it says to NOT do.
An excellent point!
The BOM is “kinda” history in that the characters are based on real characters, such as Alma and Alma the Younger (based upon Alexander Mack and Alexander Mack the Younger). King Benjamin. King Noah. Lehi. Nephi. Jesus. Jonas.
The TRUTH About Adam and Eve: http://churchofzion.webs.com/0TANNER5.htm
Elder Callister uses divine revelation as the way by which doubting Mormons can strengthen their faltering testimonies.
But how can Mormons know that the revelation they feel in their hearts is indeed true?
In his conference talk “Wrong Roads”, Elder Holland taught that his God can reveal false knowledge (RFM ep.011). In other words, even if one asks him for truth, his God will not hesitate to deceive for reasons known only to him.
So if a Mormon feels in his heart that the BoM is “true”, how does he know it is not just a feel-good falsehood revealed by his God?
There has to be a foolproof way to know when the Mormon God is just telling lies. Elder Callister has to explain this first. Otherwise, the poor Mormon is screwed. Like Elder Holland being led to the wrong road.
As Joseph Smith himself said, “Some revelations are from the devil…”
Joseph Smith’s letter to Emma from New York City is apparently one of the only few in his own hand. That proves beyond a doubt the guy could write very coherently.
There is no case for the BOM!! I must admit that I have only read the BOM cover-to-cover once. It is not that well written and was not inspiring to me. Does the BOM teach any new moral concept or anything of value that was not already known? Does it contain any wisdom not already stated in the Bible, Koran or Aesop’s Fables?
The BOM’s only unique value was if it was historically accurate. Multiple lines of evidence now indicate that the BOM has no historicity. Thus, it has no unique value. It is nothing more than another poorly written religious fiction.
I have often wondered if the BOM and Mormonism would have had any success in the 19th century if they did not validated the widely accepted, but totally incorrect, belief that Native Americans were the lost Jewish tribes. How can the BOM be inspired by God if its basic premise is wrong?