Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
Dear Radio Free Mormon. Im an avid listener from Sydney Australia and look forward to each of your podcasts. I was a convert at age 19. In 1976, married a young Mormon girl and eventually went on to have 5 children – 4 serving missions and my wife and I serving in many leadership roles including as a Bishop in a ward that included the Pacific Area Presidency at that time. I began to struggle with my testimony around 2014 when I stumbled on to the Gospel Topics Essays and the last straw for my wife was the Ensign article on the Seer Stone in 2015. My wife and I have resigned, 3 of my children and their 2 spouses are out and we are all navigating this new world in front of us.
What I wanted to share with you was in relation to this podcast. I came across an article in the Improvement Era August 1946 the link is
https://archive.org/details/improvementera4908unse/page/n63/mode/2up
at page 542 / 543 the article written buy Apostle John A Widstoe berates so called historians that dare to sully the name of Joseph Smith in suggesting he used a seer stone or that he was a treasure digger. I thought it may be of use to part 2.
Keep up the great work.
To be fair, JoW attacks stories of JS being a money digger, not using the seerstone for translation. It would be another 69 years before the Church admitted that those stories were true.
Thanks for the great cite to Elder Widstoe!
I am definitely going to use it in part 2.
With attribution!
Just wanted to make sure all subscribers are aware that the reason the premium content button doesn’t work for you is because this podcast has no premium content.
Everything I produce is published immediately for all to hear!
Thanks for listening!
RFM
RFM: First of all, thank you! I love your podcasts. Keep up the great work.
You mentioned that during the early translation of the Book of Mormon that Martin Harris had switched the seer stone out for a similar looking stone he found. When J Smith returned to looking at the stone in the hat, JS said he could not see any words to read out, and the switch was discovered. My question is, what would be the critic’s explanation for this? In other words, if JS was in fact dictating the story from his own imagination, it shouldn’t have mattered that MH changed the stone. I suppose JS could have noticed the rock looked different. Thoughts?
JS cared deeply about whatever made his stone unique and had spent hours staring at it. I imagine that a slight during swirl pattern would be obvious to him but not noticed by MH.
Also, JS was an expert trickster. He may have seen MH make the switch, or MH may have accidentally given JS a clue. MH was honest but not too smart.